<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href='static/style.xsl' type='text/xsl'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-16T14:33:43Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:clarin-pl.eu:11321/991" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://clarin-pl.eu/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:clarin-pl.eu:11321/991</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-17T10:27:55Z</datestamp><setSpec>hdl_11321_3</setSpec><setSpec>hdl_11321_4</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title>The chicken-and-egg problem in wordnet design: synonymy, synsets and constitutive relations</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Maziarz, Marek</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Piasecki, Maciej</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Szpakowicz, Stanisław</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>wordnet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>WordNet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>synset</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>lexical unit</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>plWordNet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>wordnet relations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>constitutive relations</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>aspect</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>register</dc:subject>
<dc:description>Wordnets are built of synsets, not of words. A synset consists of words. Synonymy is a relation between words. Words go into a synset because they are synonyms. Later, a wordnet treats words as synonymous because they belong in the same synset. . . Such circularity, a well-known problem, poses a practical difficulty in wordnet construction, notably when it comes to maintaining consistency. We propose to make a wordnet a net of words or, to be more precise, lexical units. We discuss our assumptions and present their implementation in a steadily growing Polish wordnet. A small set of constitutive relations allows us to construct synsets automatically out of groups of lexical units with the same connectivity. Our analysis includes a thorough comparative overview of systems of relations in several influential wordnets. The additional synset-forming mechanisms include stylistic registers and verb aspect.</dc:description>
<dc:date>2013-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:type>languageDescription</dc:type>
<dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/11321/991</dc:identifier>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
<dc:rights>CC</dc:rights>
<dc:format>text/plain; charset=utf-8</dc:format>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:format>downloadable_files_count: 1</dc:format>
<dc:publisher>Springer (The Netherlands)</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>